G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅17.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌50% higher power demand at 285W vs 190W.

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 190W instead of 285W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅17.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 190W instead of 285W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌50% higher power demand at 285W vs 190W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 17.3% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data, 36.9% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 36.9% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 5nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $200 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 17.3% more estimated average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data and 36.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 71.2%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7700 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	188 FPS	223 FPS
medium	171 FPS	205 FPS
high	155 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	201 FPS
medium	125 FPS	167 FPS
high	111 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	136 FPS
medium	79 FPS	114 FPS
high	66 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	664 FPS	561 FPS
medium	539 FPS	462 FPS
high	415 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	369 FPS
medium	400 FPS	305 FPS
high	329 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	168 FPS
medium	211 FPS	138 FPS
high	187 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	91 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	921 FPS	911 FPS
medium	742 FPS	741 FPS
high	652 FPS	644 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	519 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	704 FPS
medium	578 FPS	567 FPS
high	497 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	492 FPS
medium	403 FPS	395 FPS
high	352 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	259 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	879 FPS	785 FPS
medium	731 FPS	653 FPS
high	664 FPS	591 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	506 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	622 FPS
medium	585 FPS	517 FPS
high	514 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	399 FPS
medium	408 FPS	346 FPS
high	366 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	259 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7700

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W7700

The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 23,062 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 36.9%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
G3D Mark Score	31,578+37%	23,062
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	7680+150%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+25%	31.95 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz	2600 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	240+25%	192
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+900%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+25%	48

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s+17%	432 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+2300%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 40% difference. The Radeon PRO W7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W7700
TDP	285W	190W-33%
Recommended PSU	700W	550W-21%
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8	121.4+10%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 20% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 71% better value.