
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 190W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌13.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,130 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌26.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 150W.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅5.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 190W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $131 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌13.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,130 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌26.7% higher power demand at 190W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile better than Radeon PRO W7700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 84 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 91 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 722 FPS | 741 FPS |
| high | 634 FPS | 644 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 785 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 259 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7700

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.

Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 23,062 — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile leads by 7.6%. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 232 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,805+8% | 23,062 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+142% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS | 31.95 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 2010 MHz | 2600 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 232+21% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+873% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58+21% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 23.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 165.4+36% | 121.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile launched at $1130 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. The Radeon PRO W7700 costs 11.6% less ($131 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.0 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1130 | $999-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.0 | 23.1+5% |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | November 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #43 | #52 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












