G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅40.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 64.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
❌12% longer card at 242mm vs 216mm.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 242mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
7.5% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅40.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 64.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 200W, a 130W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 242mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌185.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 70W.
❌12% longer card at 242mm vs 216mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
7.5% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7500?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 40.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 52.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 2 Super Resolution. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about $30 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting 40.1% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 52.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 64.2%. Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 200W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W7500 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7500 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 200W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $429 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti currently gives you 52.7% higher G3D Mark and 40.1% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 64.2%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7500 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	152 FPS	136 FPS
medium	137 FPS	119 FPS
high	118 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	85 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	122 FPS
medium	107 FPS	101 FPS
high	91 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	66 FPS
medium	65 FPS	58 FPS
high	50 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7500

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	425 FPS	339 FPS
medium	366 FPS	284 FPS
high	296 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	212 FPS
medium	229 FPS	179 FPS
high	190 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	99 FPS
medium	114 FPS	83 FPS
high	96 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7500

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	859 FPS	598 FPS
medium	693 FPS	479 FPS
high	602 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	414 FPS
medium	529 FPS	356 FPS
high	452 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	299 FPS
medium	346 FPS	239 FPS
high	275 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	141 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7500

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	580 FPS	522 FPS
medium	514 FPS	453 FPS
high	424 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	425 FPS
medium	427 FPS	359 FPS
high	335 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	267 FPS
medium	266 FPS	239 FPS
high	234 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	150 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7500

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 52.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 152 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score	20,312+53%	13,298
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	8 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4864+171%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+33%	12.19 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz	1700 MHz+2%
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	152+36%	112
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+860%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	38+36%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
TDP	200W	70W-65%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	216mm
Height	112mm	115mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	101.6	190.0+87%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 7% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 64.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).