
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 216mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅11.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌24.9% longer card at 216mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 30.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 216mm, a 43mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅11.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌72.3% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌24.9% longer card at 216mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the Radeon PRO W7500 leads by 32.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 13,298+32% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+2% | 1700 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7500 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 88% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 216mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 190.0+240% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 42% less ($180 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 30.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-42% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+30% | 31.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













