Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W7500

CPU

GPU

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Radeon PRO W7500

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1700 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A770

16 GB 225

13,332

+0.3%

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

13,298

0.0%

Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

Radeon RX 7800 XT

Radeon RX 6900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅22.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.
❌29.6% longer card at 280mm vs 216mm.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 280mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
22.9% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Arc A770

2022

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅22.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 23.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 280mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.
❌29.6% longer card at 280mm vs 216mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
22.9% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A770 better than Radeon PRO W7500?

Yes. Arc A770 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 22.4% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0.3% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2023, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W7500 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022 and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A770 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Arc A770 is about $80 cheaper on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting 22.4% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.2%. Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 225W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W7500 make more sense than Arc A770?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7500 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $429 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Arc A770. The trade-off is that Arc A770 currently gives you 0.3% higher G3D Mark and 22.4% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.2%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7500 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	222 FPS	136 FPS
medium	207 FPS	119 FPS
high	179 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	85 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	122 FPS
medium	169 FPS	101 FPS
high	138 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	136 FPS	66 FPS
medium	114 FPS	58 FPS
high	91 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	34 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon PRO W7500

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	373 FPS	339 FPS
medium	318 FPS	284 FPS
high	251 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	212 FPS
medium	195 FPS	179 FPS
high	157 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	99 FPS
medium	89 FPS	83 FPS
high	75 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	53 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon PRO W7500

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	600 FPS	598 FPS
medium	480 FPS	479 FPS
high	400 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	450 FPS	414 FPS
medium	360 FPS	356 FPS
high	300 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	299 FPS
medium	240 FPS	239 FPS
high	200 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	141 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon PRO W7500

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	600 FPS	522 FPS
medium	480 FPS	453 FPS
high	400 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	450 FPS	425 FPS
medium	360 FPS	359 FPS
high	300 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	267 FPS
medium	240 FPS	239 FPS
high	200 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	150 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon PRO W7500

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and Radeon PRO W7500

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 512 Tensor cores.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score	13,332	13,298
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4096+129%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.66 TFLOPS+61%	12.19 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+41%	1700 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256+129%	112
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	32+14%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7500 has 8 GB. The Arc A770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 105.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO W7500
TDP	225W	70W-69%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	280mm	216mm
Height	—	115mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	59.3	190.0+220%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A770 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The Arc A770 costs 18.6% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the Arc A770 offers 23.2% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).