
Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W6900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,001 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 506.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 300W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W6900X is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.
Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅62.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌500.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ❌46.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 205W.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,001 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 506.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 300W, a 95W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅62.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 16 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon Pro W6900X is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌500.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ❌46.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 205W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W6900X better than Radeon Pro W5700X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 88 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 784 FPS |
| medium | 624 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 528 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 196 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 684 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 392 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 561 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 196 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700X and Radeon Pro W6900X

Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700X scores 17,591 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 2150 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,591+1% | 17,413 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5120+122% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.4 TFLOPS | 22.02 TFLOPS+134% |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz | 2150 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 144 | 320+122% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5700X comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6900X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700X draws 205W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 37.6% difference. The Radeon Pro W5700X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 305mm vs 267mm, occupying 4 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W-32% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 305mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 4 | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 85.8+48% | 58.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000. The Radeon Pro W5700X costs 83.4% less ($5001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon Pro W5700X offers 506.9% better value. The Radeon Pro W6900X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700X | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-83% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.6+507% | 2.9 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 21 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #130 | #101 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












