G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Blackwell on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).

Radeon Pro W6900X

2021

Why buy it

✅140.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

2025

Radeon Pro W6900X

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅More future proof: Blackwell on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Why buy it

✅140.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro W6900X better than GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile?

Yes. Radeon Pro W6900X is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro W6900X averages 140.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 17,413 vs 17,300 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro W6900X is a 2021 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is a 2025 model from an older generation with DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2021, better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 3nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro W6900X is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon Pro W6900X is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $6,000 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 140.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is the newer 2025 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (115W vs 300W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile make more sense than Radeon Pro W6900X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (115W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro W6900X. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro W6900X currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark and 140.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W6900X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	109 FPS	258 FPS
medium	91 FPS	235 FPS
high	77 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	96 FPS	242 FPS
medium	78 FPS	200 FPS
high	59 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	40 FPS	171 FPS
medium	35 FPS	143 FPS
high	23 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	155 FPS	564 FPS
medium	118 FPS	467 FPS
high	79 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	305 FPS
1440p
low	100 FPS	370 FPS
medium	64 FPS	303 FPS
high	47 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	195 FPS
4K
low	47 FPS	160 FPS
medium	33 FPS	135 FPS
high	26 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	88 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	654 FPS	784 FPS
medium	522 FPS	627 FPS
high	449 FPS	522 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	392 FPS
1440p
low	465 FPS	588 FPS
medium	383 FPS	470 FPS
high	324 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	270 FPS	294 FPS
4K
low	294 FPS	392 FPS
medium	242 FPS	313 FPS
high	187 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	196 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile Open Radeon Pro W6900X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	229 FPS	684 FPS
medium	193 FPS	565 FPS
high	156 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	392 FPS
1440p
low	176 FPS	561 FPS
medium	151 FPS	468 FPS
high	117 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	294 FPS
4K
low	95 FPS	363 FPS
medium	76 FPS	313 FPS
high	61 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	196 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6900X

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2430 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,300 points.

Radeon Pro W6900X

The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 17,300 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 3 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 2430 MHz vs 2150 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
G3D Mark Score	17,300	17,413
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	3 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4608	5120+11%
Boost Clock	2430 MHz+13%	2150 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W6900X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W6900X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6900X offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	1	6+500%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: 6th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
Encoder	9th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	6th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile	Radeon Pro W6900X
TDP	115W-62%	300W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	120mm
Slots	0-100%	4
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	150.4+159%	58.0