G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+55.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 338.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,270 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
181.5% HIGHER MSRP
$2,249 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W6800

2021

Why buy it

✅+55.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 338.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $2,249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,270 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
181.5% HIGHER MSRP
$2,249 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($2,249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W6800?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 55.8% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 55.8% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about $1,450 cheaper on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $2,249 MSRP, and you are getting 55.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 338.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W6800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6800 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,249 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	188 FPS	273 FPS
medium	171 FPS	258 FPS
high	155 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	249 FPS
medium	125 FPS	209 FPS
high	111 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	143 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	145 FPS
medium	79 FPS	122 FPS
high	66 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	88 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6800

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	664 FPS	555 FPS
medium	539 FPS	472 FPS
high	415 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	313 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	370 FPS
medium	400 FPS	302 FPS
high	329 FPS	239 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	153 FPS
medium	211 FPS	129 FPS
high	187 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	86 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6800

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	921 FPS	912 FPS
medium	742 FPS	730 FPS
high	652 FPS	608 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	456 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	684 FPS
medium	578 FPS	547 FPS
high	497 FPS	456 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	456 FPS
medium	403 FPS	365 FPS
high	352 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	228 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6800

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
1080p
low	879 FPS	745 FPS
medium	731 FPS	609 FPS
high	664 FPS	539 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	456 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	611 FPS
medium	585 FPS	508 FPS
high	514 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	392 FPS
medium	408 FPS	339 FPS
high	366 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	228 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6800

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W6800

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W6800

The Radeon PRO W6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2075 MHz to 2320 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,270 points. Launch price was $2,249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 20,270 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 55.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W6800). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 17.82 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6800). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2320 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 60 (Radeon PRO W6800) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
G3D Mark Score	31,578+56%	20,270
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	7680+100%	3840
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+125%	17.82 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+13%	2320 MHz
ROPs	80	96+20%
TMUs	240	240
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+900%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60	60

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W6800 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6800) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6800. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO W6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	32 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	576 GB/s+14%
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6800). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6800).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W6800's 250W — a 13.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W6800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W6800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6800
TDP	285W	250W-12%
Recommended PSU	700W	650W-7%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+37%	81.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6800 launched at $2249. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti costs 64.5% less ($1450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 9.0 (Radeon PRO W6800) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 338.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).