
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅69.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 110.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌137.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 120W.
- ❌18.3% longer card at 285mm vs 241mm.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 285W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 285mm, a 44mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅69.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 110.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 285W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 285mm, a 44mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌137.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 120W.
- ❌18.3% longer card at 285mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6600X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 664 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 366 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 400 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 187 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 921 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 742 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 652 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 720 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 403 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 879 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 664 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 706 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 585 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 460 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W6600X

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 13,113 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 140.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 240 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+141% | 13,113 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+275% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+295% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+5% | 2479 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+1400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+88% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6600X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s+125% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+2300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 81.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 120W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 500W-29% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+1% | 109.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The Radeon PRO W6600X costs 12.5% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 110.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $699-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.5+110% | 18.8 |
| Codename | AD104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #11 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












