
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+54.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 171.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,113 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌75.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅+54.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 171.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,113 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌75.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6600X make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon PRO W6600X

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 13,113 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 54.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 152 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+55% | 13,113 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+138% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+60% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2479 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+19% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+860% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+19% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 50% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 120W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 109.3+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 42.9% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 170.7% better value. The Radeon PRO W6600X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-43% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+171% | 18.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #73 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












