
Arc A770
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A770
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 120W.
- ❌16.2% longer card at 280mm vs 241mm.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 225W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 280mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Arc A770
2022Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 103.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 225W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 280mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 120W.
- ❌16.2% longer card at 280mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A770 better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6600X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 251 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 300 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and Radeon PRO W6600X

Arc A770
Arc A770
The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 512 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,332+2% | 13,113 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+100% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.66 TFLOPS+94% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2479 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+100% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X has 8 GB. The Arc A770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A770. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+129% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 120W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 280mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 59.3 | 109.3+84% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A770 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The Arc A770 costs 50.1% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Arc A770 offers 103.2% better value. The Arc A770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc A770 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-50% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.2+103% | 18.8 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #191 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













