Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO W6600X

Intel

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6600X

2021Core: 2068 MHzBoost: 2479 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $350 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • Delivers 103.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 87.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 120W.
  • 16.2% longer card at 280mm vs 241mm.

Radeon PRO W6600X

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 120W instead of 225W, a 105W reduction.
  • Measures 241mm instead of 280mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 100.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $699 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A770 better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 13,332 vs 13,113 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Arc A770 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A770 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 8 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 7nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Arc A770 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $349 MSRP. Arc A770 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Arc A770 is about $350 cheaper on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $699 MSRP, and you are getting 1.7% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $349 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is Radeon PRO W6600X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon PRO W6600X is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $699 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Arc A770 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
1080p
low222 FPS167 FPS
medium207 FPS148 FPS
high179 FPS131 FPS
ultra164 FPS111 FPS
1440p
low200 FPS140 FPS
medium169 FPS113 FPS
high138 FPS101 FPS
ultra130 FPS91 FPS
4K
low136 FPS84 FPS
medium114 FPS71 FPS
high91 FPS58 FPS
ultra84 FPS50 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
1080p
low373 FPS355 FPS
medium318 FPS287 FPS
high251 FPS221 FPS
ultra196 FPS176 FPS
1440p
low225 FPS213 FPS
medium195 FPS173 FPS
high157 FPS136 FPS
ultra123 FPS108 FPS
4K
low104 FPS103 FPS
medium89 FPS84 FPS
high75 FPS69 FPS
ultra56 FPS53 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
1080p
low600 FPS590 FPS
medium480 FPS472 FPS
high400 FPS393 FPS
ultra300 FPS295 FPS
1440p
low450 FPS443 FPS
medium360 FPS354 FPS
high300 FPS295 FPS
ultra225 FPS221 FPS
4K
low300 FPS295 FPS
medium240 FPS236 FPS
high200 FPS197 FPS
ultra150 FPS148 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
1080p
low600 FPS590 FPS
medium480 FPS472 FPS
high400 FPS393 FPS
ultra300 FPS295 FPS
1440p
low450 FPS443 FPS
medium360 FPS354 FPS
high300 FPS295 FPS
ultra225 FPS221 FPS
4K
low300 FPS295 FPS
medium240 FPS236 FPS
high200 FPS197 FPS
ultra150 FPS148 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and Radeon PRO W6600X

Intel

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6600X

The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon PRO W6600X reaches 13,113 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 512 Tensor cores.

FeatureArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
G3D Mark Score
13,332+2%
13,113
Architecture
Generation 12.7
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
6 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
4096+100%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
19.66 TFLOPS+94%
10.15 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2479 MHz+3%
ROPs
128+100%
64
TMUs
256+100%
128
L2 Cache
16 MB+700%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
32
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X has 8 GB. The Arc A770 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 128.6% advantage for the Arc A770. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
VRAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+129%
224 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
16 MB+700%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).

FeatureArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
Encoder
Dual Xe Media Engine
VCN 3.0
Decoder
Xe Media Engine
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
TDP
225W
120W-47%
Recommended PSU
650W
500W-23%
Power Connector
8-pin + 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
280mm
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
59.3
109.3+84%
💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A770 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The Arc A770 costs 50.1% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the Arc A770 offers 103.2% better value. The Arc A770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).

FeatureArc A770Radeon PRO W6600X
MSRP
$349-50%
$699
Performance per Dollar
38.2+103%
18.8
Codename
DG2-512
Navi 23
Release
October 12 2022
August 3 2021
Ranking
#191
#197