Quadro P4000 vs Radeon PRO W6600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P4000

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 105W vs 90W.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅10.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 105W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $815 MSRP).

Quadro P4000

2017

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($815 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅10.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 105W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌16.7% higher power demand at 105W vs 90W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $815 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than Quadro P4000?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W6600M averages 10.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,407 vs 11,431 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO W6600M is a 2021 card with FSR upscaling, while Quadro P4000 is a 2017 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon PRO W6600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $815 MSRP, and you are getting 10.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (11,407 vs 11,431). Quadro P4000 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro P4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro P4000 is 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM, 11,431 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P4000 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	111 FPS	140 FPS
medium	94 FPS	118 FPS
high	80 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	112 FPS
medium	79 FPS	92 FPS
high	60 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	37 FPS	50 FPS
medium	34 FPS	43 FPS
high	22 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	28 FPS

Open Quadro P4000 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	223 FPS	243 FPS
medium	190 FPS	206 FPS
high	146 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	134 FPS
1440p
low	164 FPS	170 FPS
medium	139 FPS	142 FPS
high	111 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	93 FPS
medium	80 FPS	78 FPS
high	67 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	49 FPS

Open Quadro P4000 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	514 FPS	513 FPS
medium	412 FPS	411 FPS
high	343 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	257 FPS	257 FPS
1440p
low	386 FPS	385 FPS
medium	309 FPS	308 FPS
high	257 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	257 FPS	257 FPS
medium	206 FPS	205 FPS
high	171 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	128 FPS

Open Quadro P4000 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	250 FPS	262 FPS
medium	219 FPS	231 FPS
high	176 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	147 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	191 FPS	199 FPS
medium	166 FPS	176 FPS
high	130 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	101 FPS	117 FPS
medium	83 FPS	99 FPS
high	66 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	60 FPS

Open Quadro P4000 Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 and Radeon PRO W6600M

Quadro P4000

The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 2034 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	11,431	11,407
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1792	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.304 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS+37%
Boost Clock	1480 MHz	2034 MHz+37%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	112	112
L1 Cache	672 KB+31%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12.0	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.0	1.2+20%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	6th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 15.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Quadro P4000	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	105W	90W-14%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	108.9	126.7+16%