
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 90W.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅26.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 130W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
2022Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅26.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 130W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU make more sense than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 60 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,240 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon PRO W6600M
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU scores 11,240 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 20 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 80 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,240 | 11,407+1% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.098 TFLOPS+25% | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2034 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600M has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU draws 130W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 36.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 90W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.5 | 126.7+46% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












