G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅4.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

2019

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅4.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design better than Radeon PRO W6600M?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design averages 4.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 11,461 vs 11,407 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is the overall package: you are getting DLSS Super Resolution.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020), and a 7nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 4.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer 2021 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W6600M make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark and 4.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	110 FPS	140 FPS
medium	93 FPS	118 FPS
high	77 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	112 FPS
medium	79 FPS	92 FPS
high	59 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	50 FPS
medium	34 FPS	43 FPS
high	21 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	252 FPS	243 FPS
medium	213 FPS	206 FPS
high	173 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	134 FPS
1440p
low	196 FPS	170 FPS
medium	162 FPS	142 FPS
high	131 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	114 FPS	93 FPS
medium	98 FPS	78 FPS
high	77 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	516 FPS	513 FPS
medium	413 FPS	411 FPS
high	344 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	258 FPS	257 FPS
1440p
low	387 FPS	385 FPS
medium	309 FPS	308 FPS
high	258 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	258 FPS	257 FPS
medium	206 FPS	205 FPS
high	172 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	128 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W6600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	239 FPS	262 FPS
medium	206 FPS	231 FPS
high	166 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	186 FPS	199 FPS
medium	164 FPS	176 FPS
high	128 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	117 FPS
medium	90 FPS	99 FPS
high	73 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	60 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design scores 11,461 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 288 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	11,461	11,407
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2304+29%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.46 TFLOPS	7.29 TFLOPS+34%
Boost Clock	1185 MHz	2034 MHz+72%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144+29%	112
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+360%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	36+29%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	384 GB/s+71%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	80W-11%	90W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	80°C-6%
Perf/Watt	143.3+13%	126.7