G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

2023

Why buy it

✅13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌27.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 90W.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Draws 90W instead of 115W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

2023

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Draws 90W instead of 115W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌27.8% higher power demand at 115W vs 90W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) better than Radeon PRO W6600M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 13.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 2 Super Resolution. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 13.0% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (11,353 vs 11,407). G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W6600M still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon PRO W6600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to an unclear MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	107 FPS	140 FPS
medium	96 FPS	118 FPS
high	83 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	96 FPS	112 FPS
medium	84 FPS	92 FPS
high	71 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	50 FPS	50 FPS
medium	47 FPS	43 FPS
high	36 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	359 FPS	243 FPS
medium	305 FPS	206 FPS
high	247 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	134 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	170 FPS
medium	196 FPS	142 FPS
high	160 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	113 FPS	93 FPS
medium	95 FPS	78 FPS
high	78 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	511 FPS	513 FPS
medium	409 FPS	411 FPS
high	341 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	257 FPS
1440p
low	383 FPS	385 FPS
medium	307 FPS	308 FPS
high	255 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	257 FPS
medium	204 FPS	205 FPS
high	170 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	128 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)Open Radeon PRO W6600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	511 FPS	262 FPS
medium	409 FPS	231 FPS
high	341 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	383 FPS	199 FPS
medium	307 FPS	176 FPS
high	255 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	117 FPS
medium	204 FPS	99 FPS
high	170 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	60 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	11,353	11,407
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3072+71%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.61 TFLOPS+59%	7.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1890 MHz	2034 MHz+8%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	112+17%
L1 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24	28+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600M has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile). Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+50%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 5.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+17%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	5+67%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 24.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	115W	90W-22%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	98.7	126.7+28%