G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 90W.

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 150W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

2017

Radeon PRO W6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 150W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 90W.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6600M better than GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6600M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon PRO W6600M averages 1.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,407 vs 11,566 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon PRO W6600M is a 2021 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is a 2017 model from an older high-end class with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W6600M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon PRO W6600M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon PRO W6600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (11,407 vs 11,566). Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (90W vs 150W), and FSR upscaling.

Is GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon PRO W6600M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	142 FPS	140 FPS
medium	127 FPS	118 FPS
high	109 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	122 FPS	112 FPS
medium	100 FPS	92 FPS
high	84 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	50 FPS
medium	58 FPS	43 FPS
high	43 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	241 FPS	243 FPS
medium	205 FPS	206 FPS
high	160 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	134 FPS
1440p
low	170 FPS	170 FPS
medium	144 FPS	142 FPS
high	118 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	93 FPS
medium	82 FPS	78 FPS
high	70 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	520 FPS	513 FPS
medium	416 FPS	411 FPS
high	347 FPS	342 FPS
ultra	260 FPS	257 FPS
1440p
low	390 FPS	385 FPS
medium	312 FPS	308 FPS
high	260 FPS	257 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	260 FPS	257 FPS
medium	208 FPS	205 FPS
high	173 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	128 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W6600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
1080p
low	316 FPS	262 FPS
medium	276 FPS	231 FPS
high	228 FPS	186 FPS
ultra	189 FPS	157 FPS
1440p
low	258 FPS	199 FPS
medium	222 FPS	176 FPS
high	171 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	139 FPS	117 FPS
medium	109 FPS	99 FPS
high	94 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	60 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design Open Radeon PRO W6600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,566 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M

The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design scores 11,566 and the Radeon PRO W6600M reaches 11,407 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 7.516 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 2034 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
G3D Mark Score	11,566+1%	11,407
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+43%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.516 TFLOPS+3%	7.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	2034 MHz+39%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+43%	112
L1 Cache	960 KB+88%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	256 GB/s+14%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	5+25%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
Encoder	NVENC 4.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design draws 150W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 50% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design	Radeon PRO W6600M
TDP	150W	90W-40%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	77.1	126.7+64%