G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅271.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌470% higher power demand at 285W vs 50W.
❌69.6% longer card at 285mm vs 168mm.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 285W, a 235W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 285mm, a 117mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅271.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 285W, a 235W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 285mm, a 117mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌470% higher power demand at 285W vs 50W.
❌69.6% longer card at 285mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon PRO W6400?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 271.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 8,428 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon PRO W6400 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 274.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about 248.9% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 271.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 274.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 7.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W6400 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6400 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $229 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	188 FPS	107 FPS
medium	171 FPS	95 FPS
high	155 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	95 FPS
medium	125 FPS	80 FPS
high	111 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	45 FPS
medium	79 FPS	42 FPS
high	66 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	664 FPS	165 FPS
medium	539 FPS	130 FPS
high	415 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	108 FPS
medium	400 FPS	85 FPS
high	329 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	56 FPS
medium	211 FPS	44 FPS
high	187 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	921 FPS	333 FPS
medium	742 FPS	292 FPS
high	652 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	235 FPS
medium	578 FPS	211 FPS
high	497 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	123 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	137 FPS
medium	403 FPS	124 FPS
high	352 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	879 FPS	285 FPS
medium	731 FPS	206 FPS
high	664 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	210 FPS
medium	585 FPS	149 FPS
high	514 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	105 FPS
medium	408 FPS	76 FPS
high	366 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon PRO W6400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W6400

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 8,428 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 274.7%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2331 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6400) with 240 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score	31,578+275%	8,428
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	4 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	7680+900%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+1020%	3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+12%	2331 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	240+400%	48
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+2900%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+4700%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	60+400%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6400 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	48 MB+4700%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 140.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon PRO W6400
TDP	285W	50W-82%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	168mm
Height	112mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	70°C
Perf/Watt	110.8	168.6+52%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 71.3% less ($570 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 7.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).