G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2014

Why buy it

✅57.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1209.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌650% higher power demand at 375W vs 50W.
❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1152.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 375W, a 325W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Z across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2014

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅57.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,770 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1152.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 375W, a 325W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 267mm, a 99mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1209.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌650% higher power demand at 375W vs 50W.
❌58.9% longer card at 267mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Z across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX TITAN Z better than Radeon PRO W6400?

Yes. GeForce GTX TITAN Z is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX TITAN Z averages 57.3% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 8,811 vs 8,428 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX TITAN Z is a 2014 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon PRO W6400 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2014, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX TITAN Z is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX TITAN Z is about 1209.6% more expensive on MSRP at $2,999 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 57.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W6400 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon PRO W6400 make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 375W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $229 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX TITAN Z. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX TITAN Z currently gives you 4.5% higher G3D Mark and 57.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Radeon PRO W6400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX TITAN Z Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	118 FPS	107 FPS
medium	101 FPS	95 FPS
high	86 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	96 FPS	95 FPS
medium	81 FPS	80 FPS
high	62 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	45 FPS
medium	34 FPS	42 FPS
high	21 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN Z Open Radeon PRO W6400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	129 FPS	165 FPS
medium	107 FPS	130 FPS
high	89 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	89 FPS	108 FPS
medium	66 FPS	85 FPS
high	52 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	56 FPS
medium	33 FPS	44 FPS
high	30 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN Z Open Radeon PRO W6400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	396 FPS	333 FPS
medium	317 FPS	292 FPS
high	264 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	198 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	297 FPS	235 FPS
medium	238 FPS	211 FPS
high	198 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	149 FPS	123 FPS
4K
low	198 FPS	137 FPS
medium	159 FPS	124 FPS
high	132 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN Z Open Radeon PRO W6400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	221 FPS	285 FPS
medium	188 FPS	206 FPS
high	151 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	125 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	169 FPS	210 FPS
medium	144 FPS	149 FPS
high	112 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	95 FPS	105 FPS
medium	74 FPS	76 FPS
high	59 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN Z Open Radeon PRO W6400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and Radeon PRO W6400

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 and the Radeon PRO W6400 reaches 8,428 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 2331 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score	8,811+5%	8,428
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	5760 ×2+650%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.046 TFLOPS ×2+41%	3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	876 MHz	2331 MHz+166%
ROPs	48 ×2+50%	32
TMUs	240 ×2+400%	48
L1 Cache	240 KB	256 KB+7%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Z has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit x2+50%	256-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.0	1.2+20%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 3 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Z	Radeon PRO W6400
TDP	375W	50W-87%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	3	1-67%
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	23.5	168.6+617%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 92.4% less ($2770 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the Radeon PRO W6400 offers 1169% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).