Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

2023

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

2023

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 25W, a 10W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 25W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W6300 better than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,500 vs 5,560 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon PRO W6300 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W6300 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $200 MSRP. Radeon PRO W6300 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon PRO W6300 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $200 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.1% higher G3D Mark. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 25W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) make more sense than Radeon PRO W6300?

Yes. Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 25W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W6300. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W6300 currently gives you 1.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6300 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)	Radeon PRO W6300
1080p
low	88 FPS	101 FPS
medium	76 FPS	89 FPS
high	56 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	70 FPS	89 FPS
medium	61 FPS	75 FPS
high	41 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	51 FPS
4K
low	27 FPS	43 FPS
medium	25 FPS	40 FPS
high	16 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	26 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Open Radeon PRO W6300

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)	Radeon PRO W6300
1080p
low	119 FPS	160 FPS
medium	93 FPS	127 FPS
high	72 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	62 FPS
1440p
low	86 FPS	106 FPS
medium	65 FPS	81 FPS
high	53 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	44 FPS
4K
low	52 FPS	54 FPS
medium	39 FPS	41 FPS
high	31 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	21 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Open Radeon PRO W6300

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)	Radeon PRO W6300
1080p
low	248 FPS	250 FPS
medium	198 FPS	200 FPS
high	165 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	186 FPS	188 FPS
medium	148 FPS	150 FPS
high	124 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	124 FPS	125 FPS
medium	99 FPS	100 FPS
high	81 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	56 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Open Radeon PRO W6300

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)	Radeon PRO W6300
1080p
low	153 FPS	250 FPS
medium	119 FPS	193 FPS
high	96 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	125 FPS
1440p
low	112 FPS	188 FPS
medium	88 FPS	144 FPS
high	70 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	94 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	101 FPS
medium	52 FPS	75 FPS
high	42 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	49 FPS

Open Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)Open Radeon PRO W6300

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Radeon PRO W6300

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,560+1%
Architecture	Xe LPG	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4	768+19100%
Boost Clock	1950 MHz	2040 MHz+5%
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 50% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)	Radeon PRO W6300
TDP	15W-40%	25W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	366.7+65%	222.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).