
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570
2022Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
GeForce MX570
2022Radeon PRO W6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX570 across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX570 better than Radeon PRO W6300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 49 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Radeon PRO W6300

GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2040 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce MX570) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6300) with 64 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738+3% | 5,560 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+51% | 3.133 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2040 MHz+77% |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64+33% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The GeForce MX570 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce MX570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 0% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+3% | 222.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. The GeForce MX570 costs 25% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce MX570 offers 37.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-25% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3+38% | 27.8 |
| Codename | GA107 | Navi 24 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #407 | #413 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













