
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅42.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 189.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.4% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅42.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 189.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌150.4% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro W5700X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 198 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro W5700X

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 17,591 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 15.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+15% | 17,591 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+72% | 9.4 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2040 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 2.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-2% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 305mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+18% | 85.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 60.1% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 189.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-60% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+189% | 17.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #130 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












