
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅27.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 205W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌46.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 140W.
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
2022Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅27.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 205W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌46.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 140W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile better than Radeon Pro W5700X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 793 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 476 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 198 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile and Radeon Pro W5700X

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 5632 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 44 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,621 points.

Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile scores 17,621 and the Radeon Pro W5700X reaches 17,591 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,632 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 15.88 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 1410 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,621 | 17,591 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5632+144% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.88 TFLOPS+69% | 9.4 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1410 MHz | 2040 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176+22% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 6+500% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile draws 140W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 37.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 305mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 140W-32% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 305mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 125.9+47% | 85.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #100 | #130 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












