
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅60.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅60.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro W5700

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 14,380 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 41.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+41% | 14,380 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+82% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1930 MHz+16% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 2.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-2% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+45% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 50.1% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 182.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+183% | 18.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












