G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 124.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 14,380).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅+42.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌
220.9% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 124.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+42.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 14,380).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌
220.9% HIGHER MSRP
$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro W5700 better than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1060 averages 2.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,380 vs 10,064 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro W5700 is a 2019 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro W5700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016, 42.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro W5700 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro W5700 is about 220.9% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 42.9% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1060 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1060 is 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM, 10,064 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	117 FPS	150 FPS
medium	105 FPS	132 FPS
high	91 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	127 FPS
medium	87 FPS	104 FPS
high	76 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	74 FPS
medium	49 FPS	62 FPS
high	41 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro W5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	216 FPS	226 FPS
medium	181 FPS	190 FPS
high	148 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	146 FPS
medium	107 FPS	122 FPS
high	87 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	78 FPS
medium	51 FPS	66 FPS
high	49 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro W5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	453 FPS	647 FPS
medium	362 FPS	518 FPS
high	302 FPS	431 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	324 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	485 FPS
medium	272 FPS	388 FPS
high	226 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	243 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	324 FPS
medium	181 FPS	259 FPS
high	151 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	162 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro W5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	358 FPS	332 FPS
medium	302 FPS	284 FPS
high	260 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	196 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	275 FPS
medium	254 FPS	236 FPS
high	208 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	147 FPS
medium	133 FPS	116 FPS
high	123 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro W5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro W5700

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 14,380 — the Radeon Pro W5700 leads by 42.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1930 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
G3D Mark Score	10,064	14,380+43%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+11%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS	8.893 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	1930 MHz+11%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+11%	144
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 13% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro W5700
TDP	180W-12%	205W
Recommended PSU	400W-20%	500W
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	55.9	70.1+25%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 68.8% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 124.4% better value. The Radeon Pro W5700 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).