
Arc B570
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B570
2025Why buy it
- ✅49.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $580 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 256.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc B570 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌264.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
Arc B570
2025Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅49.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $580 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 256.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 205W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc B570 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌264.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
- ❌36.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc B570 better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 633 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B570 and Radeon Pro W5700

Arc B570
Arc B570
The Arc B570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 16 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,060 points. Launch price was $219.

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B570 scores 14,060 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B570 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Arc B570) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 11.52 TFLOPS (Arc B570) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2500 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,060 | 14,380+2% |
| Architecture | Xe2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.52 TFLOPS+30% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2500 MHz+30% | 1930 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 160-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B570) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Arc B570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 160-bit+25% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B570) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Intel Xe Media (Arc B570) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: Intel Xe Media vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Arc B570) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Intel Xe Media | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Intel Xe Media | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B570 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 31% difference. The Arc B570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B570) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 249mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-27% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 249mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.7+34% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B570 launched at $219 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799. The Arc B570 costs 72.6% less ($580 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.2 (Arc B570) vs 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Arc B570 offers 256.7% better value. The Arc B570 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc B570 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-73% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.2+257% | 18.0 |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 16 2025 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #169 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













