
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+176.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 314.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,351 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+176.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 314.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,351 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌50.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro W5500X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5500X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 83 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro W5500X

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 7,351 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 176.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W5500X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+176% | 7,351 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+217% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+200% | 5.398 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1757 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+58% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5500X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 125W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 125W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+73% | 58.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 33.4% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.3 (Radeon Pro W5500X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 313.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-33% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+314% | 12.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #345 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












