
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 125W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌139.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 40W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 128.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 125W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌139.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5500X better than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS make more sense than Radeon Pro W5500X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 83 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Radeon Pro W5500X
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 7,351 — the Radeon Pro W5500X leads by 5%. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000 | 7,351+5% |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1757 MHz+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 5.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 5+67% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 125W — a 103% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-68% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 175.0+198% | 58.8 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS costs 58.3% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12.3 (Radeon Pro W5500X) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS offers 127.6% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-58% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0+128% | 12.3 |
| Codename | — | Navi 14 |
| Release | October 26 2023 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #482 | #345 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












