
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 390.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 390.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID P40-8Q better than Radeon Pro W5500X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500X make more sense than GRID P40-8Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon Pro W5500X

GRID P40-8Q
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon Pro W5500X reaches 7,351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507+2% | 7,351 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1757 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-8Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 5.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 125W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 125W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 58.8+76% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599. The Radeon Pro W5500X costs 80% less ($2401 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.3 (Radeon Pro W5500X) — the Radeon Pro W5500X offers 392% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $599-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 12.3+392% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 14 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #505 | #345 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












