
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500M across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
2011Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500M across 12 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5500M better than Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire and Radeon Pro W5500M

Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 12 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 2240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,500 points.

Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire scores 3,500 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is built on Terascale 2 while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,240 (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,500 | 3,470 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2240+59% | 1408 |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 6 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4,MVC | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-41% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 70.0+72% | 40.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | — |
| Codename | Blackcomb XTX | Navi 14 |
| Release | July 12 2011 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #517 | #544 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












