
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 125W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 520.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 125W vs 100W.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 125W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 520.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 125W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5000 (móvel) better than Radeon Pro W5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500 make more sense than Quadro P5000 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 202 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 47 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 (móvel) and Radeon Pro W5500

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.

Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) scores 9,000 and the Radeon Pro W5500 reaches 8,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro W5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500). Raw compute: 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1400 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,000 | 8,913 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.48 TFLOPS+64% | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz+13% | 1400 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 125W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-20% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+26% | 71.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399. The Radeon Pro W5500 costs 84% less ($2100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) — the Radeon Pro W5500 offers 519.4% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $399-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6 | 22.3+519% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #235 | #294 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













