Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro VII

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅7.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,550 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 446.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro VII

2020

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A770 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
444.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,899 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Arc A770

2022

Radeon Pro VII

2020

Why buy it

✅7.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,550 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 446.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A770 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
444.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,899 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A770 better than Radeon Pro VII?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Arc A770 averages 7.1% more FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 13,332 vs 13,264 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Arc A770 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A770 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $349 MSRP. Arc A770 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Arc A770 is about $1,550 cheaper on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $1,899 MSRP, and you are getting 7.1% more estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $349 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Is Radeon Pro VII still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro VII is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $1,899 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Arc A770 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro VII Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
1080p
low	222 FPS	199 FPS
medium	207 FPS	184 FPS
high	179 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	185 FPS
medium	169 FPS	154 FPS
high	138 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	136 FPS	118 FPS
medium	114 FPS	99 FPS
high	91 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	69 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon Pro VII

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
1080p
low	373 FPS	340 FPS
medium	318 FPS	298 FPS
high	251 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	215 FPS
medium	195 FPS	185 FPS
high	157 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	102 FPS
medium	89 FPS	86 FPS
high	75 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	57 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon Pro VII

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
1080p
low	600 FPS	597 FPS
medium	480 FPS	478 FPS
high	400 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	298 FPS
1440p
low	450 FPS	448 FPS
medium	360 FPS	358 FPS
high	300 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	298 FPS
medium	240 FPS	239 FPS
high	200 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	149 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon Pro VII

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
1080p
low	600 FPS	525 FPS
medium	480 FPS	452 FPS
high	400 FPS	388 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	298 FPS
1440p
low	450 FPS	426 FPS
medium	360 FPS	358 FPS
high	300 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	263 FPS
medium	240 FPS	239 FPS
high	200 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	149 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon Pro VII

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and Radeon Pro VII

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro VII

The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon Pro VII reaches 13,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro VII uses GCN 5.1, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1700 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
G3D Mark Score	13,332	13,264
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.1
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4096+7%	3840
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.66 TFLOPS+51%	13.06 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+41%	1700 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256+7%	240
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro VII) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCE 4.1
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 7.2
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro VII's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon Pro VII). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro VII
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	280mm	305mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	59.3+12%	53.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A770 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899. The Arc A770 costs 81.6% less ($1550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) — the Arc A770 offers 445.7% better value. The Arc A770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).