
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅69.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 737.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌451.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro Vega 64X
2019Why buy it
- ✅69.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,801 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 737.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌451.4% HIGHER MSRP$2,200 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 64X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 526 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro Vega 64X

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 13,369 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 51.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+52% | 13,369 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+19% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+35% | 12.03 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+13% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 256+68% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+380% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+90% | 53.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 81.9% less ($1801 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 734.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-82% | $2200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+734% | 6.1 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #190 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












