Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

CPU

GPU

Arc A770

2022Core: 2100 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A770

16 GB 225

13,332

0.0%

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Shared System RAM 250

13,369

+0.3%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

Radeon RX 7800 XT

Radeon RX 6900 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅48.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 528.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
530.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,200 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Arc A770

2022

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Why buy it

✅48.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅Delivers 528.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A770 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
530.4% HIGHER MSRP
$2,200 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A770 better than Radeon Pro Vega 64X?

Yes. Arc A770 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Arc A770 averages 48.6% more FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 13,332 vs 13,369 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Arc A770 is a 2022 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Pro Vega 64X is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of Unknown, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A770 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Arc A770 is about $1,851 cheaper on MSRP at $349 MSRP versus $2,200 MSRP, and you are getting 48.6% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (13,332 vs 13,369). It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 528.6%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro Vega 64X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 64X is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,200 MSRP, even if Arc A770 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 64X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
1080p
low	222 FPS	108 FPS
medium	207 FPS	98 FPS
high	179 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	96 FPS
medium	169 FPS	82 FPS
high	138 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	136 FPS	48 FPS
medium	114 FPS	43 FPS
high	91 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	29 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
1080p
low	373 FPS	301 FPS
medium	318 FPS	262 FPS
high	251 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	164 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	204 FPS
medium	195 FPS	175 FPS
high	157 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	100 FPS
medium	89 FPS	84 FPS
high	75 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	56 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
1080p
low	600 FPS	526 FPS
medium	480 FPS	452 FPS
high	400 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	301 FPS
1440p
low	450 FPS	413 FPS
medium	360 FPS	347 FPS
high	300 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	226 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	258 FPS
medium	240 FPS	214 FPS
high	200 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	135 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
1080p
low	600 FPS	258 FPS
medium	480 FPS	213 FPS
high	400 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	151 FPS
1440p
low	450 FPS	197 FPS
medium	360 FPS	162 FPS
high	300 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	118 FPS
medium	240 FPS	105 FPS
high	200 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	70 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon Pro Vega 64X reaches 13,369 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
G3D Mark Score	13,332	13,369
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4096	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.66 TFLOPS+63%	12.03 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+63%	1468 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64
TMUs	256	256
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has 0 MB. The Arc A770 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCE 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 280mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon Pro Vega 64X
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	Integrated
Length	280mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	59.3+11%	53.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A770 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. The Arc A770 costs 84.1% less ($1851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.2 (Arc A770) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Arc A770 offers 526.2% better value. The Arc A770 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).