
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅40.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 210W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Radeon Pro Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅40.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 210W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌23.5% higher power demand at 210W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon Pro Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 272 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 123 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and Radeon Pro Vega 56

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1138 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,104 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 12,104 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 8.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 8.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170+9% | 12,104 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+42% | 8.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+42% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 224+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+298% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 56 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 56) — the Radeon Pro Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 56).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 56's 210W — a 21.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-19% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5+35% | 57.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #147 | #222 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













