
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+50.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,270 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌36.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅+50.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 106.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,270 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌36.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon Pro Vega 48?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 48 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 127 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 42 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro Vega 48

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 11,270 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 50.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+51% | 11,270 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+60% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+37% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+367% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 140% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 30W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 375.7+276% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 26.9% less ($121 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 106.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-27% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+107% | 25.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #114 | #241 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












