G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018

Why buy it

✅10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

Radeon Pro Vega 16

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega 16: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro Vega 16 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro Vega 16 better than GeForce GTX 460 768MB?

Yes. Radeon Pro Vega 16 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro Vega 16 averages 10.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 4,809 vs 4,800 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a 2018 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce GTX 460 768MB is a 0 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 460 768MB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 2 GB instead of Unknown and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro Vega 16 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 10.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.2% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 460 768MB still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does GeForce GTX 460 768MB make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega 16?

Yes. GeForce GTX 460 768MB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro Vega 16. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro Vega 16 currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark and 10.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 460 768MB Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega 16 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
1080p
low	64 FPS	79 FPS
medium	53 FPS	68 FPS
high	37 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	51 FPS	70 FPS
medium	42 FPS	60 FPS
high	26 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	21 FPS	25 FPS
medium	20 FPS	23 FPS
high	12 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 768MB Open Radeon Pro Vega 16

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
1080p
low	62 FPS	111 FPS
medium	41 FPS	82 FPS
high	30 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	39 FPS
1440p
low	35 FPS	63 FPS
medium	20 FPS	43 FPS
high	15 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	10 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	12 FPS	24 FPS
medium	7 FPS	16 FPS
high	6 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	4 FPS	9 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 768MB Open Radeon Pro Vega 16

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
1080p
low	216 FPS	216 FPS
medium	173 FPS	173 FPS
high	144 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	162 FPS	162 FPS
medium	130 FPS	130 FPS
high	108 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	108 FPS	108 FPS
medium	86 FPS	87 FPS
high	63 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 768MB Open Radeon Pro Vega 16

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
1080p
low	122 FPS	140 FPS
medium	99 FPS	111 FPS
high	86 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	74 FPS
1440p
low	92 FPS	101 FPS
medium	74 FPS	81 FPS
high	64 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	54 FPS	60 FPS
medium	43 FPS	46 FPS
high	34 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 460 768MB Open Radeon Pro Vega 16

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Radeon Pro Vega 16

GeForce GTX 460 768MB

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon Pro Vega 16

The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 14 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 815 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,809 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB scores 4,800 and the Radeon Pro Vega 16 reaches 4,809 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB is built on Fermi while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses GCN 5.0. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
G3D Mark Score	4,800	4,809
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 5.0
Shading Units	336	1024+205%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 460 768MB offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro Vega 16).

Feature	GeForce GTX 460 768MB	Radeon Pro Vega 16
Encoder	PureVideo HD VP4	VCE 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 460 768MB draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 16's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 16 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 460 768MB) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 16). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 210mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.