Arc A770 vs Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A770

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌42.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 158W.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅75% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 16 GB).
✅Draws 158W instead of 225W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Arc A770

2022

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Alchemist on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅75% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (28 GB vs 16 GB).
✅Draws 158W instead of 225W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 28 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌42.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 158W.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 28 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $349 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A770 better than Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU?

Yes. Arc A770 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 13,332 vs 13,130 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Arc A770 is a 2022 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A770 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A770 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $349 MSRP. Arc A770 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Arc A770 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $349 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $349 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Is Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Arc A770 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A770 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	222 FPS	211 FPS
medium	207 FPS	191 FPS
high	179 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	183 FPS
medium	169 FPS	158 FPS
high	138 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	136 FPS	76 FPS
medium	114 FPS	66 FPS
high	91 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	41 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	373 FPS	320 FPS
medium	318 FPS	269 FPS
high	251 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	212 FPS
medium	195 FPS	176 FPS
high	157 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	115 FPS
4K
low	104 FPS	100 FPS
medium	89 FPS	81 FPS
high	75 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	51 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	600 FPS	591 FPS
medium	480 FPS	473 FPS
high	400 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	295 FPS
1440p
low	450 FPS	443 FPS
medium	360 FPS	355 FPS
high	300 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	222 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	295 FPS
medium	240 FPS	236 FPS
high	200 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	148 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
1080p
low	600 FPS	321 FPS
medium	480 FPS	279 FPS
high	400 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	450 FPS	237 FPS
medium	360 FPS	212 FPS
high	300 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	137 FPS
4K
low	300 FPS	142 FPS
medium	240 FPS	125 FPS
high	200 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	78 FPS

Open Arc A770 Open Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770 and Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

Arc A770

The Arc A770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2100 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,332 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU

The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,130 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A770 scores 13,332 and the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU reaches 13,130 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770) vs 3,584 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Raw compute: 19.66 TFLOPS (Arc A770) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	13,332+2%	13,130
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4096+14%	3584 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.66 TFLOPS+83%	10.75 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+60%	1500 MHz
ROPs	128+100%	64 ×2
TMUs	256+14%	224 ×2
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A770 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU has 28 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU offers 75% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770) vs 4 MB (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU) — the Arc A770 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	16 GB	28 GB+75%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A770) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A770) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A770) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU).

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A770 draws 225W versus the Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU's 158W — a 35% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A770) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 280mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A770	Radeon PRO V710 MxGPU
TDP	225W	158W-30%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	280mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	59.3	83.1+40%