
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($470 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 184W instead of 300W, a 116W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ❌63% higher power demand at 300W vs 184W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
2021Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($470 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 184W instead of 300W, a 116W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $470 MSRP).
- ❌63% higher power demand at 300W vs 184W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 12GB better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 717 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 538 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 269 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 287 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 12GB and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
GeForce RTX 2060 12GB
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 184W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,935 points.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB scores 15,935 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,176 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 7.181 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,935+2% | 15,633 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2176 | 3584 ×2+65% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.181 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz+10% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 224 ×2+65% |
| L1 Cache | 2.1 MB+139% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB draws 184W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 47.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2060 12GB) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 88°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 184W-39% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 88°C | 75°C-15% |
| Perf/Watt | 86.6+66% | 52.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 12GB | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $470 | — |
| Codename | TU106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | December 7 2021 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #133 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













