
Arc B580
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc B580
2024Why buy it
- ✅27.8% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 Battlemage on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 300W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B580 across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 190W.
Arc B580
2024Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅27.8% more average FPS across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 Battlemage on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 190W instead of 300W, a 110W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc B580 across 33 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌57.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 190W.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc B580 better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 352 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 575 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 719 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 575 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 240 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc B580 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Arc B580
Arc B580
The Arc B580 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 13 2024. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2670 MHz to 2670 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,977 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc B580 scores 15,977 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc B580 is built on Xe2 while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Arc B580) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 13.67 TFLOPS (Arc B580) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 2670 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,977+2% | 15,633 |
| Architecture | Xe2 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584 ×2+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.67 TFLOPS+27% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2670 MHz+78% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224 ×2+40% |
| L1 Cache | 5 MB+468% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc B580 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 18 MB (Arc B580) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Arc B580 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 18 MB+350% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc B580) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe2 Media Engine (Arc B580) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: Xe2 Media Engine vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (Arc B580) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe2 Media Engine | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | Xe2 Media Engine | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc B580 draws 190W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 44.9% difference. The Arc B580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Arc B580) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 272mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W-37% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 272mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 84.1+61% | 52.1 |
Value Analysis
The Arc B580 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Arc B580 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | BMG-G21 | Vega 10 |
| Release | December 13 2024 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #132 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













