
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅28.0% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅28.0% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU better than Quadro P5200 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P5200 Max-Q make more sense than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 24 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q scores 12,308 and the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU reaches 12,258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Raw compute: 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1569 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,308 | 12,258 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584 ×2+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.033 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1569 MHz+5% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224 ×2+40% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU's 300W — a 100% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-67% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 123.1+201% | 40.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













