G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,399 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1051.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 80W instead of 260W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

✅18.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1066.5% HIGHER MSRP
$6,999 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
❌225% higher power demand at 260W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,399 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1051.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 80W instead of 260W, a 180W reduction.

Why buy it

✅18.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1066.5% HIGHER MSRP
$6,999 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
❌225% higher power demand at 260W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro SSG better than Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)?

Yes. Radeon Pro SSG is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro SSG averages 18.3% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,972 vs 10,829 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro SSG is a 2016 card with FSR upscaling, while Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is a 2019 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro SSG is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro SSG is about 1066.5% more expensive on MSRP at $6,999 MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting 18.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.3% higher G3D Mark. Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) make more sense than Radeon Pro SSG?

Yes. Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (80W vs 260W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $600 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro SSG. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro SSG currently gives you 1.3% higher G3D Mark and 18.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro SSG Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	93 FPS	121 FPS
medium	81 FPS	103 FPS
high	66 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	78 FPS	98 FPS
medium	69 FPS	81 FPS
high	51 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	43 FPS
medium	27 FPS	37 FPS
high	18 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	22 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	241 FPS	235 FPS
medium	194 FPS	204 FPS
high	159 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	121 FPS
1440p
low	185 FPS	166 FPS
medium	147 FPS	139 FPS
high	120 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	107 FPS	95 FPS
medium	88 FPS	79 FPS
high	72 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	50 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	455 FPS	494 FPS
medium	390 FPS	395 FPS
high	325 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	247 FPS
1440p
low	325 FPS	370 FPS
medium	283 FPS	296 FPS
high	244 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	185 FPS
4K
low	218 FPS	247 FPS
medium	182 FPS	197 FPS
high	140 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	123 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro SSG

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	162 FPS	243 FPS
medium	133 FPS	211 FPS
high	115 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	117 FPS	185 FPS
medium	99 FPS	164 FPS
high	86 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	106 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	105 FPS
medium	59 FPS	88 FPS
high	47 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	56 FPS

Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) and Radeon Pro SSG

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

Radeon Pro SSG

The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) scores 10,829 and the Radeon Pro SSG reaches 10,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro SSG uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG). Raw compute: 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
G3D Mark Score	10,829	10,972+1%
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2304	4096+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.359 TFLOPS	8.602 TFLOPS+35%
Boost Clock	1380 MHz+31%	1050 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144	256+78%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+130%	1 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro SSG relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro SSG has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro SSG offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG).

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCE 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	UVD 7.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 260W — a 105.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro SSG). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)	Radeon Pro SSG
TDP	80W-69%	260W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	135.4+221%	42.2

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro SSG launched at $6999. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) costs 91.4% less ($6399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) offers 1025% better value. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).