G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

2023

Why buy it

✅12.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 260W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌126.1% higher power demand at 260W vs 115W.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

2023

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

✅12.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 260W, a 145W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌126.1% higher power demand at 260W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) better than Radeon Pro SSG?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) averages 12.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 11,353 vs 10,972 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is a 2023 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro SSG is a 2016 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $6,999 MSRP, and you are getting 12.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro SSG really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro SSG still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro SSG is 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM, 10,972 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro SSG Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	107 FPS	121 FPS
medium	96 FPS	103 FPS
high	83 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	96 FPS	98 FPS
medium	84 FPS	81 FPS
high	71 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	50 FPS	43 FPS
medium	47 FPS	37 FPS
high	36 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	359 FPS	235 FPS
medium	305 FPS	204 FPS
high	247 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	121 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	166 FPS
medium	196 FPS	139 FPS
high	160 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	113 FPS	95 FPS
medium	95 FPS	79 FPS
high	78 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	511 FPS	494 FPS
medium	409 FPS	395 FPS
high	341 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	247 FPS
1440p
low	383 FPS	370 FPS
medium	307 FPS	296 FPS
high	255 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	185 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	247 FPS
medium	204 FPS	197 FPS
high	170 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	123 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro SSG

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	511 FPS	243 FPS
medium	409 FPS	211 FPS
high	341 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	383 FPS	185 FPS
medium	307 FPS	164 FPS
high	255 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	192 FPS	106 FPS
4K
low	255 FPS	105 FPS
medium	204 FPS	88 FPS
high	170 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and Radeon Pro SSG

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.

Radeon Pro SSG

The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 and the Radeon Pro SSG reaches 10,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro SSG uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
G3D Mark Score	11,353+3%	10,972
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072	4096+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.61 TFLOPS+35%	8.602 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1890 MHz+80%	1050 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	256+167%
L1 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro SSG relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro SSG has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro SSG offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+700%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	6+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 260W — a 77.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro SSG). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
TDP	115W-56%	260W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	98.7+134%	42.2