GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro SSG

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 260W, a 210W reduction.
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

✅35.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌420% higher power demand at 260W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)

2025

Radeon Pro SSG

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 260W, a 210W reduction.
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅35.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌420% higher power demand at 260W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro SSG better than GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)?

Yes. Radeon Pro SSG is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro SSG averages 35.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,972 vs 10,465 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro SSG is a 2016 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is a 2025 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro SSG is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon Pro SSG is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $6,999 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 35.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is the newer 2025 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 260W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) make more sense than Radeon Pro SSG?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 260W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro SSG. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro SSG currently gives you 4.8% higher G3D Mark and 35.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro SSG Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	133 FPS	121 FPS
medium	115 FPS	103 FPS
high	101 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	117 FPS	98 FPS
medium	95 FPS	81 FPS
high	80 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	43 FPS
medium	58 FPS	37 FPS
high	41 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	121 FPS	235 FPS
medium	92 FPS	204 FPS
high	70 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	121 FPS
1440p
low	67 FPS	166 FPS
medium	44 FPS	139 FPS
high	33 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	95 FPS
medium	17 FPS	79 FPS
high	14 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	471 FPS	494 FPS
medium	377 FPS	395 FPS
high	314 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	247 FPS
1440p
low	353 FPS	370 FPS
medium	283 FPS	296 FPS
high	235 FPS	247 FPS
ultra	177 FPS	185 FPS
4K
low	235 FPS	247 FPS
medium	188 FPS	197 FPS
high	157 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	123 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro SSG

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
1080p
low	417 FPS	243 FPS
medium	338 FPS	211 FPS
high	285 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	235 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	185 FPS
medium	270 FPS	164 FPS
high	208 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	106 FPS
4K
low	162 FPS	105 FPS
medium	124 FPS	88 FPS
high	109 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	92 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro SSG

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) and Radeon Pro SSG

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,465 points.

Radeon Pro SSG

The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) scores 10,465 and the Radeon Pro SSG reaches 10,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro SSG uses GCN 3.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
G3D Mark Score	10,465	10,972+5%
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4608+13%	4096
Boost Clock	2520 MHz+140%	1050 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro SSG relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
Encoder	NVENC 6th gen	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd gen	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 260W — a 135.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro SSG). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro SSG
TDP	50W-81%	260W
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	209.3+396%	42.2