
GRID P40-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P40-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P40-8Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 580X better than GRID P40-8Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID P40-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 85 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-8Q and Radeon Pro 580X

GRID P40-8Q
GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon Pro 580X reaches 7,540 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507 | 7,540 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1200 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+33% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-8Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 40% difference. The Radeon Pro 580X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 50.3+51% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-8Q launched at $3000 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600. The Radeon Pro 580X costs 80% less ($2400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the Radeon Pro 580X offers 404% better value. The Radeon Pro 580X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $600-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 12.6+404% |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 18 2019 |
| Ranking | #505 | #339 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












