
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅48.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.8% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro 580
2017Why buy it
- ✅48.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 160.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.8% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon Pro 580?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 580 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro 580

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro 580's 7,753 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 29.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+30% | 7,753 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+60% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+44% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+67% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 580 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro 580's 150W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 150W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+8% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 50.2% less ($251 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 15.5 (Radeon Pro 580) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 160.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 580 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+161% | 15.5 |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #327 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













