G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+153.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 58.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌119.2% higher power demand at 285W vs 130W.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 130W instead of 285W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,442 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

2023

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅+153.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 58.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅Draws 130W instead of 285W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌119.2% higher power demand at 285W vs 130W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,442 vs 31,578).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 31,578 vs 12,442 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro 5700 XT is a 2020 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, 153.8% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is about 59.8% more expensive on MSRP at $799 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 153.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 58.8%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 5700 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5700 XT is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5700 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	188 FPS	240 FPS
medium	171 FPS	227 FPS
high	155 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	150 FPS
1440p
low	151 FPS	222 FPS
medium	125 FPS	188 FPS
high	111 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	117 FPS
medium	79 FPS	98 FPS
high	66 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	64 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	664 FPS	231 FPS
medium	539 FPS	193 FPS
high	415 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	366 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	496 FPS	150 FPS
medium	400 FPS	125 FPS
high	329 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	269 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	250 FPS	79 FPS
medium	211 FPS	66 FPS
high	187 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	159 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	921 FPS	560 FPS
medium	742 FPS	448 FPS
high	652 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	280 FPS
1440p
low	720 FPS	420 FPS
medium	578 FPS	336 FPS
high	497 FPS	280 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	498 FPS	280 FPS
medium	403 FPS	224 FPS
high	352 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	296 FPS	140 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	879 FPS	383 FPS
medium	731 FPS	329 FPS
high	664 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	600 FPS	217 FPS
1440p
low	706 FPS	305 FPS
medium	585 FPS	265 FPS
high	514 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	460 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	477 FPS	164 FPS
medium	408 FPS	131 FPS
high	366 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 12,442 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 153.8%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 1499 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
G3D Mark Score	31,578+154%	12,442
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	7680+200%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+422%	7.675 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2610 MHz+74%	1499 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	240+50%	160
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+1100%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	RDNA 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	Unified Video Decoder 7.0
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 74.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
TDP	285W	130W-54%
Recommended PSU	700W	500W-29%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+16%	95.7

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 37.4% less ($299 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 58.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).