
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Radeon Pro 5700 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 130W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌30% higher power demand at 130W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5700 XT better than Quadro P5200 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5200 Max-Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 64 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 280 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q scores 12,308 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1569 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,308 | 12,442+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.033 TFLOPS+5% | 7.675 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1569 MHz+5% | 1499 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 26.1% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-23% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 123.1+29% | 95.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #217 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













