
Quadro P4000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P4000
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quadro P4000
2017Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 130W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $16 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $815 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2% HIGHER MSRP$815 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌23.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 105W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5700 better than Quadro P4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 514 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 and Radeon Pro 5700

Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
The Quadro P4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1202 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 105W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,431 points. Launch price was $815.

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4000 scores 11,431 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 5.304 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,431 | 11,469 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2304+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.304 TFLOPS | 6.221 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz+10% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P4000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P4000) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4000 draws 105W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 21.3% difference. The Quadro P4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P4000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 105W-19% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.9+23% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4000 launched at $815 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. The Radeon Pro 5700 costs 2% less ($16 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.0 (Quadro P4000) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 offers 2.9% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P4000 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $815 | $799-2% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 14.4+3% |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | February 6 2017 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #239 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












