Radeon Pro 5700 vs Quadro M6000

AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M6000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

11469

G3D Mark Score

11769

Performance Difference

Quadro M6000 is 2.6% faster than Radeon Pro 5700

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Radeon Pro 57008192 MB
016GB32GB
1080pHigh
54%
low85%
medium82%
high60%
ultra27%
1440pMedium
32%
low82%
medium60%
high27%
ultra10%
4KLow
16%
low60%
medium27%
high10%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM Β· 11,469 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pHigh settings for most AAA titles at 60 FPS.
1440pMedium settings recommended. May drop below 60 FPS.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

Quadro M600012288 MB
016GB32GB
1080pHigh
65%
low86%
medium86%
high71%
ultra45%
1440pMedium
48%
low86%
medium71%
high45%
ultra28%
4KLow
29%
low71%
medium45%
high28%
ultra11%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

12 GB VRAM Β· 11,769 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pHigh settings for most AAA titles at 60 FPS.
1440pMedium settings recommended. May drop below 60 FPS.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Quality mode: +30-40% FPS. Frame Gen available on RTX 40 series.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro M6000 performs 2.6% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Radeon Pro 5700 and Quadro M6000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Radeon Pro 5700 and Quadro M6000

AMD

Radeon Pro 5700

The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:144
Vram:8192 MB
L2 Cache:4 MB
Core Clock:1243 MHz
Boost Clock:1350 MHz
Shading Units:2304
Transistor Count:10,300 million
Texture Fill Rate:194.4
Manufacturing Process:7 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):130 Watt
Floating Point Performance:6.221 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Navi 10
Architecture:RDNA 1.0 (2019βˆ’2020)
Release Date:August 4 2020
Performance Ranking Position:238
NVIDIA

Quadro M6000

The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:96
TMUs:192
Vram:12288 MB
L1 Cache:1.1 MB
L2 Cache:3 MB
Core Clock:988 MHz
Boost Clock:1114 MHz
Shading Units:3072
Transistor Count:8,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:213.9
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt
Floating Point Performance:6.844 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM200
Architecture:Maxwell 2.0 (2014βˆ’2019)
Launch Price:$4,199.99
Release Date:March 21 2015
Performance Ranking Position:228

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro 5700 and Quadro M6000