
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅21.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
2019Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅21.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5700 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 516 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 413 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 239 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 83 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 885 MHz to 1185 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,461 points.

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design scores 11,461 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 5.46 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1185 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,461 | 11,469 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.46 TFLOPS | 6.221 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1185 MHz | 1350 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 47.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-38% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 143.3+62% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | TU106B | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 29 2019 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #237 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












